Sport

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up

Andy Murray beaten by brilliant Roger Federer in Australian Open final

Scot loses in straight sets in Melbourne as Federer takes his 16th grand Slam title.

31 January 2010 11:58 GMT

154327
Andy Murray beaten by brilliant Roger Federer in Australian Open final

Top level: Roger Federer takes his 16th Grand Slam title Pic: © Reuters/David Gray

Andy Murray’s hopes of a first Slam title were ended by Roger Federer in Melbourne as the Swiss superstar produced a sterling performance to win 6-3 6-4 7-6 (13-11). An emotional Murray was in tears after the match and apologised to his fans but said he hoped to return to Australia and win in the future.

“I can cry like Roger, it's just a shame I can’t play like him,” he admitted.

Murray gave his all in the match, which lasted two hours and forty minutes, but could not match his opponent, who kept the pressure on throughout. Federer was simply unplayable at times and came through a difficult third set to continue his incredible Grand Slam record.

Federer had never lost from being two sets up in 115 Grand Slam matches and though Murray was a break up in the third, the champion showed his all-round game was better than the Scot’s. He said afterwards that, despite Murray falling short for the second time in a major final, the British number one was too good a player not to win a Slam title.

Murray was playing well in the first set and showed no sign of nerves in the early stages, winning his share of points but lacking the aggression of his opponent. Federer got an early break to go 2-0 in front but was immediately pegged back when Murray produced a magnificent backhand to set up two beak points. A clinical forehand from Murray took the game and he then held serve to make it 2-2.

Murray looked to be gaining the upper hand and had three break points in game five but Federer dug in and saw off the challenge with a strong service game.

The Scot’s first serve was at the same level and Federer pounced on every error, making life tough for Murray and ensuring he had to work hard to hold.  Federer got his chance and took it with a cracking forehand to make it 5-3 and served out to take the set.

Murray was broken to love at the beginning of the second as Federer hit top form. Struggling to hold serve and unable to make inroads on his opponent, even luck seemed to be against the British number one when Federer won a point after hitting the net cord in game four. Murray saved four break points and showed plenty resistance but Federer’s immaculate service game saw him race to a two set lead.

It was all or nothing in the third set for Murray but although he went a break up he could not capitalise. Federer broke back to set up an epic tie break. Murray had set point four times but couldn’t see it through and Federer had championship point twice but was held at bay. A final thumping forehand saw Murray stretching and when his return hit the net it gave Federer the tie-break 13-11, a straight sets win and a fourth Australian Open title.
 

Ads by Google

Share

There are 4 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Default avatar

    1. 01 Feb 2010 11:43Pragmatic punter said

    I don't think Murray got his first serves going well enough!

    I just hope he isn't going to be the Colin Montgomery of tennis.

    But we should rember Federer was a top player when nobody outside his friends had heard of Andy Murray!

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 01 Feb 2010 15:10Elaine S said

    I think deep down with the level of playing Federer had shown in the AO that he was still on top of his game. Andy who surpassed Britains hopes completely by even getting to the final was still under Fed's shadow, he showed moments of brilliance and sadly was just really getting into his stride in the 3rd set but it came too late.

    I don't think anyone can berate Andy, we have waited so long for a player that has all the qualities Andy has and I am willing to be patient a little while longer. With Tim he was a great player but after a certain amount of years I gave up believing he had the ability to go any further. With Andy its complete faith that he will.

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Avatar for MISCHKA'SMUM

    3. 01 Feb 2010 15:41MISCHKA'SMUM said

    I agree with the first comment to a certain extent - Andy will NOT be a CM! I think people tend to forget that Andy is only 22! He has plenty of time to mature in his game, both physically and mentally. He is too good a player NOT to win a Slam and it will happen sooner rather than later.

    I also noticed on certain forums yesterday that when BRITAINS'S Andy Murray lost, he rapidly reverted to SCOTLAND'S Andy Murray!

    Report as unsuitable

  4. Default avatar

    4. 03 Feb 2010 13:09booboo3 said

    it just goes to show what a wonderful player

    roger federer is, and andy murray still has

    a long way to go to beat him.. he was ahead

    in the tiebreak, but could'nt convert it.. I'm

    sorry andy but the time's you have gone head to

    head with federer & nadal come to that, they

    have been ill or were carrying injuries... you

    may win a grand slam one day, but you will still

    be a long way off of, (sixteen slam titles)&22

    slam finals.. and federer's just missing out on

    three calendar slam's... to win three in one

    year, three time's is just amazing.....

    Report as unsuitable

You need to be logged in to comment.

sign in

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.

Watch now

Video